http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local_state/story/134741.html
OCT 10, 2009
RALEIGH -- The N.C. Supreme Court attracted national attention a few
weeks ago as the first court in the nation to rule that a convicted
felon has a right to own a gun.

What drew little notice is that Edward Thomas Brady, the justice who
wrote the 5-2 decision in August, is a federally licensed gun dealer and
gun manufacturer who has collected more than $5,000 a year from gun
sales since 2007.

Legal experts split over whether Brady was properly bringing his
perspective to the case or should have recused himself from the
decision.

"I don't think gun dealers should be deciding the constitutionality of
gun laws," said Dennis Henigan, vice president for law and policy at the
pro-gun control Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence in Washington.

Gene Nichol, a law professor at UNC-Chapel Hill, described the ruling by
the justices as "the most aggressive gun rights decision" in the
country. "Then you read that the highly-activist opinion is written by a
gun dealer and manufacturer," he said. "It sure smells."

Other legal scholars, however, countered that the decision was narrowly
written to resolve that particular case and likely wouldn't apply to
many others.

Two former state chief justices, one a Republican and the other a
Democrat, said they saw no need for Brady to recuse himself.

"It seems to me that there's no conflict nor even arguably the
appearance of a conflict," said Burley Mitchell, a Democrat and chief
justice from 1995 to 1999. "I've got a driver's license, but I regularly
ruled on cases involving automobiles and driver's rights. If a judge
starts recusing over connections that remote, you'll have a judiciary
that can dodge every difficult case."

  ...
-- 
--henry schaffer

P.S. The original story about the decision is
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local_state/story/67066.html
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to