Heller's Self-Defense" 
New Criminal Law, Vol. 13, p. 449, 2010 

BOAZ SANGERO (
http://hq.ssrn.com/Journals/RedirectClick.cfm?url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1518496&partid=47512&did=85709&eid=109165479
), Academic Center of Law and Business
Email: [email protected]


This article reflects on District of Columbia v. Heller and proposes a
new footing and limit to the right to bear arms: a person’s inalienable
right to self defense. Self-defense is a natural right embedded in
personhood and is antecedent to the social contract that sets up a
state. This right consequently remains with the person following the
establishment of the state and allows her to use proportional force
necessary for resisting aggression. The right to bear arms derives from
the constitutional right to self-defense, which merits protection under
both the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments. This instrumental nexus calls
for a dynamic determination of the scope of the right to bear arms under
the Second Amendment, along Heller’s lines. The scope of the right to
bear arms should be defined by an ordinary citizen’s necessity to use
arms in defending herself proportionally against criminals. This
criterion will allow courts to deliver both predictable and balanced
decisions that align with originalism. 
 

*****************************************************************************************
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M.                                  
o-   651-523-2142  
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)                    f-   
651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235                                               
 c-   612-865-7956
[email protected]                             
http://law.hamline.edu/node/784                      
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to