"The Ninth Amendment in Light of Text and History" (
http://hq.ssrn.com/Journals/RedirectClick.cfm?url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1678203&partid=47512&did=86166&eid=109707729
) 

MICHAEL W. MCCONNELL (
http://hq.ssrn.com/Journals/RedirectClick.cfm?url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1479896&partid=47512&did=86166&eid=109707729
), Stanford Law School
Email: [email protected]


The Ninth Amendment may seem a strange subject for a lecture at a
conference on the recent decisions of the Supreme Court. After all, the
Court has never squarely based a holding on the Ninth Amendment and has
scarcely even discussed its meaning. Some scholars regard the amendment
as an ‘‘inkblot’’ or as nothing more than a warning not to read the
enumeration of powers too liberally or the enumerated rights too
narrowly. It plays virtually no role in modern constitutional
litigation. And yet the Ninth Amendment is the subject of two recent
books and many articles, and rightly so: the amendment, properly
understood in light of its text and history, helps us understand the
constitutional structure of powers granted and rights reserved, the
relation of the Bill of Rights to the original Constitution of 1787, and
the role of natural rights in American constitutionalism. 
 

*****************************************************************************************
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M.                                  
o-   651-523-2142  
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)                    f-   
651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235                                               
 c-   612-865-7956
[email protected]                             
http://law.hamline.edu/node/784                      
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to