I happened to read an opinion piece in month-old Time magazine Point: Arms and the Unbalanced By Joe Klein Thursday, Jan. 13, 201 http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2042170,00.html and was intrigued by "In Arizona, Loughner could simply walk into a gun store, buy his Glock and carry it about, concealed, without a permit."
He's right about CCW "without a permit" since AZ recently stopped requiring CCW permits. But, even if a permit was still required, would Loughner have refrained from this act if he didn't have the permit? More directly, does Joe Klein think that Loughner would have refrained? A different question is whether Loughner would have qualified for a permit under the previous laws. -- --henry schaffer _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
