I disagree with any legislative disablement of any right, including the RKBA. The Fifth Amendment requires judicial due process, which means a court order on a petition to disable the right. It does not work to disable some rights in a court order, then have a statute disable other rights because those first rights were disabled. Each disablement of each right must be separately and explicitly petitioned, argued, and decided. Otherwise, the legislature or Congress could make it a capital crime to possess something if one had been convicted of spitting on the sidewalk. That would be a violation of due process.

Discussed in Public Safety or Bills of Attainder?
-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society               http://constitution.org
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322           twitter.com/lex_rex
Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001  [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to