On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 03:26:09AM -0500, Joseph E. Olson wrote:
> "Dangerous and Unusual Misdirection: A Look at the Common Law Tradition
> of Prohibiting Going Armed with Dangerous and Unusual Weapons to the
> Terror of the People, as Cited in District of Columbia versus Heller"  
> 
> DANIEL RICHARD PAGE, affiliation not provided to SSRN
> Email: [email protected]

  Hmm - at William & Mary, he is listed as a student.

  The link to the paper at ssrn.com is
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1859395

  It's an interesting look into the history of the terms.

  Also, I've often wondered about "terror of the people" - as a "soccer
mom" can easily shriek with terror at the sight of open carry.  The
Attorney General of NC published

6. Going Armed To The Terror Of The People

By common law in North Carolina, it is unlawful for a person to arm
himself/herself with any unusual and dangerous weapon, for the purpose
of terrifying others, and go about on public highways in a manner to
cause terror to others. The N.C. Supreme Court states that any gun is an
unusual and dangerous weapon for purposes of this offense. Therefore,
persons are cautioned as to the areas they frequent with firearms.

http://www.grnc.org/firearms.htm 

  While I can't find this at the NC DOJ site, there is something similar
in the State's Case Notes to Article I Sec 30. of the Constitution of
North Carolina:  Militia and the right to bear arms. 

Common-Law Offense Not Abrogated. - The constitutional guaranty of the
right to bear arms does not abrogate the common-law offense of going
armed with unusual weapons to the terror of the people. State v. Dawson,
272 N.C. 535, 159 S.E.2d 1 (1968). 
http://www.nctreasurer.com/2008Lawbook/nccarti/nccarti-30.htm
>  ...
-- 
--henry schaffer
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to