You might look at this exchange between Robert Churchill and Cornell: http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2007/09/debate_on_saul.php
Churchill pulls his punches in his review, but there are some important criticisms nonetheless. His mostly positive review infuriates Cornell, who responds viciously. Churchill gets much the better of the argument, and further responds effectively. Jim Lindgren Northwestern --- On Mon, 4/30/12, Henry Schaffer <[email protected]> wrote: From: Henry Schaffer <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Saul Cornell - "A Well Regulated Militia" To: [email protected] Date: Monday, April 30, 2012, 7:40 AM There's a lot of information at: http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/pleadings.html --henry schaffer _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
