The latest data from the FBI's Uniform Crime Report on weapons  used in 
homicide (2011) does not support the need for new gun control laws.  The 
data<http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8>
 shows that both the number and rate of gun homicides has decreased since at 
least 2007.  This includes handguns, rifle and shotguns.  Assault Weapons, 
which are the prime targets, are included in the "rifles" count.  Use of rifles 
has declined, and in 2011 stood at 323 homicides.  Unfortunately, there is no 
good data available on Assault Weapons alone.  Whatever "causes" or counteracts 
firearms homicides is causing a decrease.  It is fairly obvious that gun 
control laws are not causing the decline.  In fact, the number of guns in 
society and the number of people license to carry have increased markedly in 
recent years. Further, there is no credible evidence that guns cause crime or 
that gun control works.  A series of tragic mass murders with guns has fueled 
an emotional cry for more gun control.  Emotion is not a good basis for policy. 
Why don't people take a look at the data and the research. However, emotion is 
a good basis for propaganda. Politicians of all-stripes are always looking for 
emotional ammunition to support their views. The propaganda campaign for and 
against new gun controls is well underway.  I'm sick of it already.

Ray

Raymond G. Kessler, M.A., J.D.
Professor of Criminal Justice
Sul Ross State University
Alpine, TX  79830
Office phone:  432 837-8166

Please feel free to check out my blog at http://crimelawandjustice.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to