I think another way of expressing Professor Althouse's idea is to point out
that a firearm is something tangible, a physical object, something easy to
focus the mind on, easy to form a mental symbol of, and thus much more
satisfying psychologically as a cause to fight against.

 

This way of thinking, which I'll call animist-like, has always been
widespread.  Animism, a belief shared by probably all cultures during very
early periods of development, assigns the causes of important events to
tangible objects, e.g. certain animals or a magic tree or an enchanted
spring.  The psychological tendency towards this way of "understanding"
exists in all of us, even if education has caused us to scorn many
particular animist beliefs. 

 

As for specific examples of animist-like thinking, among a great many, one
that springs to mind is the belief in witches among early European settlers
to America.  They found it easy to blame witches for crop failures and other
mortal threats to their existence.  A witch is something tangible - it is
easy to envision killing a witch.  Once this quick "explanation" is arrived
at, it is easy to proceed to taking what feel like productive actions toward
solving the problem.  If one can fool oneself, however tenuously, into
believing that the mortal threat is gone once the witch has been burned, one
can also feel some hope.

 

The gun, the magic tree, and the witch as "explanations" provide quick and
easy relief from the anxiety of not understanding the real causes of
distressing events, and provide the basis for actions which feel like
productive involvement.  These actions, based on self-delusion, are almost
always at best a waste of time and are frequently counterproductive.

 

Merrill Gibson

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Olson, Joseph
E.
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:16 PM
To: Firearms Reg, List
Subject: She's got something here.

 

>From UofWisc law professor Ann Althouse's award winning Blog.

 

It occurred to me, after the Sandy Hook murders, that blaming guns is a
secular substitute for blaming the devil. People find it too challenging to
figure out why a human being would do this terrible thing and they latch on
to the idea that the gun made it happen. Suicide presents a similar
challenge, and one way to fathom it is to say: It's was the gun. Isn't it
like saying the devil made him do it? The gun/the devil is a great go-to
answer, freeing you from wracking your brain about the workings of the human
mind. 


 

-- 

****************************************************************************
************************************
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M.
o    651-523-2142  
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)
f     651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235
c    612-865-7956

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to