Why, it's as if none of these jurists have ever heard of Miller v. US. :-p
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 11:42 AM, Henry Schaffer <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/141945A.P.pdf > <http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/141945A.P.pdf> > > (haven't read this 116 page item yet) > > An article which called my attention to this opinion - and which loves it: > > http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/02/21/appeals_court_holds_second_amendment_doesn_t_protect_assault_weapons.html > > <http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/02/21/appeals_court_holds_second_amendment_doesn_t_protect_assault_weapons.html>
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
