Washington State is toying with the idea of compelling FFLs to report when a purchaser fails a background check.
http://www.king5.com/news/politics/senate-surprises-with-vote-on-firearms-bi ll/433001920 The notion is that the purchaser, if they knew they were prohibited, lied on the sundry forms and thus have committed a crime. What are the con law aspect to this? Can FFLs be compelled to do work for the state? Is there a privacy issued involved (disclosing personal info about the buyer)? Does reporting create endangerments for the FFL or anyone else? Guy Smith <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] www.linkedin.com/in/gunfacts/
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
