Hey, if one gun a month is "reasonable, common-sense" legislation -- then one gun every THREE months must be even MORE reasonable and MORE sensible. Right?
At 6:32 PM +0000 9/15/03, Taliesin MacAran wrote: >> From: NSSF Bullet Points <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> b.. NEW YORK DEMANDS . . . Big Apple mayor Michael Bloomberg >>has signed on with big city mayors from Chicago and Los Angeles in asking >>the 46 uncommitted U.S. Senators to vote against S. 659, the bill that >>would protect the firearms industry against junk lawsuits their cities >>have filed. According to The New York Daily News, Bloomberg also insulted >>retailers by likening them to drug dealers during his radio program on >>WABC. Bloomberg also wants additional restrictions on firearms in the >>Empire State, including a limit of one purchase every 90 days. The New >>York Times (free subscription required) reveals the flaw in another state >>proposal to enable lawsuits against dealers any time a gun is criminally >>used. It might leave New York's Finest without the means to protect >>themselves. "As a practical matter," John Feinblatt, the city's criminal >>justice coordinator, told the Times, "the threat of unlimited liability >>without fault will effectively prevent gun manufacturers from selling >>weapons to anyone in New York City, including the Police Department." -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://alum.mit.edu/www/tavares | RKBA! Burgert was informally accused of conspiring to collect information on government agents. "They had officers' names, addresses, places they eat, places they shop, stuff about their kids." I don't understand why the officials of Flathead County are concerned -- if they have "nothing to hide." If they are "doing nothing wrong," what difference does it make who knows it? Maybe if more governmental officials experienced such invasions against their privacy, they would be less eager to subject the American people to privacy-invading measures like the national ID card. --WWW.JIMDUENSING.COM (PARAPHRASED)
