Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Once firearms are registered ,however, confiscation becomes extremely
> easily.  Few citizens would
> resist once the federal records made arrest and imprisonment a
> certainty.  The few who did not comply
> could easily be dealt with later.

I am skeptical that mandatory registration actually makes
confiscation much easier--at least at the level of gun
ownership typical in the U.S.  If 0.1% of the population owned
guns, yes, I suppose registration would simplify confiscation.
It could be done over the course of a month or two of
concerted effort, and generate relatively little public
awareness (assuming that a free press no longer existed).
I think it likely that only 1 out of 50 would resist, and
while expensive in terms of police officers killed, it could
be accomplished without running out of officers or regular
troops.

But with perhaps 40% of the population armed, such confiscation
would be very, very difficult to do.  The sheer scale of it
would preclude doing it even over the course of a year, and
if 1 out of 50 gun owners resisted, the government would
probably run out of police officers or soldiers willing to
engage in such actions.

A selective disarmament of "unreliable sorts" or particular
weapons might be practical, but the all encompassing confiscation
preferred by some would not be.  The "unreliable sorts" could
be disarmed by selective searches, and unless this was a
very large fraction of the population, if only 40% were
armed, searching the homes of unarmed political dissidents
wouldn't be all that expensive in terms of time and manpower.

Don't get me wrong: there's enough selective use of registration
records to worry me, but the police state model of complete
confiscation doesn't seem to be the major problem.  For that
matter, use of existing 4473 forms, anyone had ever held a
hunting license, confiscation of gun rights group membership
lists, and subscription lists for hunting and gun magazines,
would probably get a big chunk of the most dangerous gun owners
anyway.

What registration lists do accomplish, is to make is sound
plausible that effective confiscation is possible.  I know
that such information would disproportionately fall on the
law-abiding, and have little or no effect on career criminals.
I don't think the general population is aware of this, however.

Clayton E. Cramer           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.claytoncramer.com
Being a citizen of the Republic is not a spectator sport.

Reply via email to