Den 2011-04-01 10:53 skrev Dimitry Sibiryakov såhär: > 01.04.2011 10:47, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: >> Personally, I don't see problems with combining both approaches, i.e. >> use the fast "versioning" mode for the a priori valid changes and >> perform the explicit validation for possibly problematic changes. This >> way we could easily allow altering string columns to shorter lengths, >> altering strings to numerics, etc. Someone just needs to implement all >> these checks :-) > > May I suggest to add non-standard optional clause NOVALIDATE for users > who are sure > that validation is unnecessary and want to save time on commit?..
Good idea, but what if the user later turns out to have been wrong? How to handle it? Kjell -- -------------------------------------- Kjell Rilbe DataDIA AB E-post: kj...@datadia.se Telefon: 08-761 06 55 Mobil: 0733-44 24 64 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
