07.04.2011 16:47, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > But with smart pointers we must do the following: > > Smart<IAttachment> at = ... > att->release(); // refCounter == 1 > att->blaBlaBla(); > > We want to detach - and here problems come. We can't simply call: > > att->detach(); > > because ~Smart() will try to release an already destroyed object, > causing AV.
True for dumb universal smart pointers. But a smarter one could overload not only operator-> but also the detach() method and mark itself as not requiring release inside the dtor. Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
