On 06/23/11 01:59, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >> On 06/22/11 11:13, Roman Rokytskyy wrote: >>> Would be interesting to check how does Firebird behaves. >> Roman, we have some implementation of tpc-c, which works with firebird. >> I often use it to check firebird stability under load. But telling true >> it seems that it measures using some other tpmC. I think so because with >> one of the latest tests with trunk I've got >> TPC-C Throughput: 199378.00 tpmC >> on >2 years old box (5 warehouse / 5 client, embedded connection). And >> when the result differs >2 orders of magnitude (compared with 7000 in >> that article), it looks like something different is measured. > This is because you tested CPU-bound load. Make FW=ON and you'll > see the difference :) > I did it. And really got: TPC-C Throughput: 7017.00 tpmC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
