On 08/09/11 11:07, Kjell Rilbe wrote: > Den 2011-08-09 08:54 skrev Alex Peshkoff såhär: >> On 08/08/11 19:10, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: >>> 08.08.2011 16:57, Kjell Rilbe wrote: >>>> So, I ask you in the devel team: is the shadow file feature going to go >>>> away or will you make sure it stays functional? >>> If discussion about dropping of shadow is ever raised I will vote >>> against. >>> >> +1 > OK, so it seems the feature will stay. Will it be "modernized"? I recall > that Helen or Ann has stated that the feature has some severe > performance issues. I don't know the details, but can and will anything > be done that would be relevant in a RAM disk + regular disk setup (or > otherwise)?
The only known for me currently problem is that shadows are not supported in nbackup. What about performance - it might be good to set FW mode for main file and mirror separately. Not sure how much FW affects SSD in your case, but on posix systems there is a workaround: mount ssd async, regular disk for shadow - sync and set FW off for database. As the result main file and shadow will have different FW modes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
