On 11/14/11 02:17, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > I thought about to change cache_writer in this direction - make it to do > "mini-flush" > instead of writting one page at time. But, note, we have no cache_writer > thread in CS\SC > and we can do a little (almost nothing) when page lock is downgraded (often > case in CS, i > think). >
What prevents us from adding cache writer to classic? > I don't think that writting more than one dirty page when free buffer is > needed is good > idea as it could delay user process significantly. I could be wrong... > Worth checking... Remember how changing FW affects tpc/c performance on small database? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
