> Heavy loaded systems should use clusters. That's all. While one node is on
> maintenance,
> others do all work. These systems need clusters anyway for high availability
> and/or load
> balancing. One can't be serious running critical systems on a single server.
>
I don't agree with you. You generalize, and is not allways good.
From your POV what is not serious is having an "enterprise database" with that
serious and important restriction.
I have not readed until your posts that for heavy loaded systems is necessary
one cluster of firebird, and what is worse, who don't use them is not serious.
Replication is not easy with firebird, and is not native in the engine. There
is so many problems with replication depending on the features of firebird
used. Is different use firebird for store data in tables than programming
business logic in database and use user restrictions, triggers, etc.
I do not use any other rdbms, but is there the same problem with postgre,
Oracle, sqlserver, informix, db2, etc.?
Don't misinterpret my words, i love firebird.
Jesus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
