On 01/10/12 21:17, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:06:04AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >>> - The check for fortified source functions depends on the use of >>> such functions. If none of them are present the error "no >>> protectable libc functions used" is shown. However, there are also >>> results that show "no" (e.g. /usr/bin/fbsvcmgr). As such, there >>> might indeed be a problem with the LDFLAGS being overwritten. >> Most of the binaries suffer from this, and in the end the reason >> appears to be missing usage of CPPFLAGS when compiling C++ sources. > That's correct. I've meant CPPFLAGS. > > Cheers, > Moritz >
CPreProcessorFLAGS when compiling C++ resources? I always use for it CXXFLAGS, which are taken into an account in firebird makefiles. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/495598/difference-between-cppflags-and-cxxflags-in-gnu-make ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
