> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Rotteveel (JIRA) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Viernes, 27 de Enero de 2012 13:45 > > RDB$UNIQUE_FLAG is 1 for a unique index, but NULL for > non-unique (I would expect 0) > RDB$INDEX_INACTIVE is NULL for newly created indices (I would > expect 0), issuing an ALTER INDEX <name> INACTIVE makes it 1 > and 0 if it has been again altered to ACTIVE > RDB$INDEX_TYPE is 1 for DESCENDING indices, but NULL for > ASCENDING (I would expect 0)
Adriano, can you confirm that you have default values for those fields in DdlNodes.epp in v3? For what I see, we won't get nulls in v3 in those fields, so it should be possible to make them non-nullable. C. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
