On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:19:18 +0400, Alex Peshkoff <peshk...@mail.ru> wrote: >> I am going to think it over, not having to implement it is of course far >> easier. >> > > The main problem is that I do not know good reason to waste time > implementing it ...
The challenge to get it to work of course ;) >>> It's much more useful to decide what to do with SRP. And (taking wider >>> look at it) - will it be possible to load client parts of plugins by >>> Java client? >> Technically yes, but most Java developers usually do not want to bother >> with the hassle that is involved with using native libraries. So a pure >> java implementation will be needed. > > Certainly it will be great to have Java implementation of SRP. BTW, I've > used to rewrite it from Jim's Java code :-) > > But in a case when one has some authentication plugin it will be very > useful to learn to load it in order not to rewrite it to Java. I see what you mean. I will add it to my list of things to investigate. Of course the 'workaround' would be that if you do need a native plugin to authenticate, then you could just as well use the Type 2 (native) driver . This uses fbclient, which - I assume - should be able to load the plugin by itself. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
