On 29 May 2012 03:51, Alex Peshkoff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There is syntax problem with providing comments on privileges -
> privileges do not have names.


Is it not possible to extend the syntax of the comment on DDL? for example

COMMENT ON [SELECT|UPDATE|INSERT|DELETE|ALL] GRANT FOR [USER|ROLE] UPON
[TABLE|VIEW|PROCEDURE] IS ..........

The above is very clumsy but a better way would be

GRANT [RIGHT] FOR [OBJECT] TO [USER|ROLE] AS GRANT_NAME

Then COMMENT ON GRANT GRANT_NAME is .......

Also, if we are going to be maintaining the users in the database itself,
perhaps a comment upon the user.....


> Adding new field to existing table(s) is not a problem in ODS12 (FB3).
>
> Glad to hear.


> Querying them is OK from sql2008 POV. As soon as we have namespaces we
> will provide views, making it possible to extract data from system
> tables in a standard manner. Adding new non-select commands for it is
> not correct way to go.
>
>
Sounds reasonable - do you have any idea when namespaces/schema are going
to be looked at?   The use of schema and the expansion of the width of the
sql object names would benefit Firebird greatly - especially for those who
use multibyte character sets for their databases.

Best regards

Dalton
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to