11.06.2012 18:01, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > There is one problem. We can't make it really C++ friendly without > removing the need to pass a status everywhere, but there is no way to > return warnings without them. We can maintain the status parameter, but > then, it makes things still ugly. > > Would you consider about removing warnings from Firebird? By remove I > mean that inner layers will not carry them anymore for user. That even > means that someone using v3 API and old engine will not see them anymore.
May be on contrary: promote warnings to errors with a special primary GDS code. Then everybody will have to check them. It'll be fun. -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
