On 22/08/2012 12:41, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 22.08.2012 17:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> Sorry, this is not good. >> >> Better alternatives: RDB$DB_TRANSACTION, RDB$DB_TRANSACTION_ID, >> RDB$TRANSACTION_ID... > "DB" prefix is not good because it is not "DB" value. It has the same meaning of DB_KEY. It's not a key from the DB, but a value extracted from it.
> If suggested by Dmitry Yemanov RDB$RECORD_VERSION is not good for you, I > would suggest > RDB$ROWSCN or RDB$ROW_TRANSACTION. > RDB$RECORD_VERSION is not bad, my only complain is that it's not explicit that this is a transaction id value too. Maybe RDB$RECORD_TRANSACTION ? Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
