Den 2012-11-18 19:04 skrev Leyne, Sean såhär: >>> Speaking about meanings, I'd suggest this change: >>> >>> gbak -> fb_dump >>> nbackup -> fb_backup >>> >>> because IMO it better reflects their goals. >> Although I was the one who approached Nikolay about the ideas for >> nbackup, and paid for the development, I am not sure that nbackup is the >> ideal backup that it could be. So, I think the nbackup name should be kept. > In re-reading this post, I realize that it could be read with a > demanding/arrogant/commanding tone. That was not my intent. > > I was simply trying to say, that I even with my history with the utility, I > have a nagging feeling that nbackup could be better. So, I am not sure if > nbackup is worthy of the official blessing that "fb_backup" conveys.
I know that I had problems with Nbackup when I tried it with our system. I got some transaction commit error. Don't recall exactly what it was, and I never found time to investigate it further. It happened when the database was "locked" in nbackup terms, regardless of copy in progress or not. And it was on FB 2.0 I believe. So, perhaps this is totally irrelevant, but just maybe it's a little alert that nbackup might have some problems. Regards, Kjell -- -------------------------------------- Kjell Rilbe DataDIA AB E-post: kj...@datadia.se Telefon: 08-761 06 55 Mobil: 0733-44 24 64 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
