On 20/06/2013 03:26, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > On 06/19/13 20:40, Lee Graber wrote: >> I am hoping I got the correct discussion alias. I am trying to figure out if >> I am going down a hole that I will not be happy with. My team uses >> Firebird's embedded engine for a couple of things and we are currently on >> the 2.1.x line. We are attempting to build embedded for Mac OSX using >> clang++ and libc++ but as I have started this I am finding myself fixing a >> lot of syntactical errors. There are lots of issues from c++11-narrowing >> checks among others. I can see on some threads that there are developers >> building using clang but from what I can glean that must only be happening >> on the 3.0 branch (I tried 2.5.x and it also had issues building so I stuck >> with 2.1.x to try and fix things since we are not looking to bump versions >> right now). If 3.0 is building with clang++ and libc++ in 3.0 branch, then >> someone must have done some work. > As far as I know people used to build at least 2.5 using clang but it > was more than a year ago. And you know that sometimes warnings in > compilers tend to become errors in next versions. Therefore 2.5 can be > not buildable with fresh clang. What about 3.0 - may be it was also > tried with clang that time, but there were so many changes since that > time... We use VC on windows and gcc on other systems (there are 2.5 > ports to native compilers for most of widely used unixes). But what > about Mac - we always used gcc. > I always build 3.0 with clang (with libstdc++) and some warnings turned off.
Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
