On 27/08/2013 18:15, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 27.08.2013 22:06, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> Why do a future version will go against the SQL standard? > Does standard explicitly mention that identity's internal sequence must be > user-manipulatible? Does it say that in must be the same type of sequence as > "standalone" > ones? No, but neither mention the contrary. But...
> Say, Firebird one day decide to support cluster/cloud architecture and > keep values in > identity column globally unique. It will require an external source of > sequentional values. > It's clear a sequence. It even supports the parameters: <common sequence generator option> ::= <sequence generator start with option> | <basic sequence generator option> <basic sequence generator option> ::= <sequence generator increment by option> | <sequence generator maxvalue option> | <sequence generator minvalue option> | <sequence generator cycle option> Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
