On 09/03/13 11:43, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:

> Hm, I had to run autoreconf etc. on it to build it on Ubuntu 8.04
>

Did you try with initial package or with one we have in the tree?
Must say I've generated configure myself (on fresh gentoo) cause 
Makefile.am was slightly modified - I've removed doc and tests build, we 
do not need it.

>> The only problem is that some system,
>> which can build 2.5.2 correctly, may be not able to build 2.5.3 due to
>> missing appropriate version of automake if we backport all that changes
>> to 2.5.
> I have a build of 2.5.0.26091 lying around that was built on Ubuntu 5.0,
> so it should be possible.
>
>

To be precise I'm not sure why did that guy need automake at all :-)
It's required only if one touch Makefile.am. For regular builds existing 
in the tree configure is OK.
May be it's really not so dangerous to backport editline...


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to