On 10/21/13 16:20, Philippe Makowski wrote: > Le 21/10/13 14:04, Alex Peshkoff a écrit : >> On 10/21/13 15:14, Paul Reeves wrote: >>> so I guess I need to dig around in the %install script. >>> >> Probably. >> Please try to keep it backward-compatible - I do not want to change >> build environment for 2.5. >> > yes, and by the way I don't really understand why you want to build > these rpm
I agree that quality of SF rpms is very low. Therefore I've stopped supporting them in fb3 (btw, why only redhat package manager, there are also debian, gentoo,... ?) But for old versions I prefer to keep things 'as was', i.e. if someone downloaded rpm for 2.5.2 he should be able to do same thing for 2.5.3 and preferably without need to upgrade package manager itself. > And for your information, for me building these rpm on a Linux using rpm > as package manager never worked, it works only on platform don't using > rpm. funny > Sometimes (long ago) I was building rpms for 1.5 SS on redhat9. That were same scripts (certainly, might be changed for such long time). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
