31.10.2013 14:45, Robbert-Jan wrote: > The new fields rdb$generator_name and rdb$identity_type are now defined in > rdb$relation_fields. > I think it would be more consistent if they were stored in rdb$fields (like > eg. > rdb$computed_source). > rdb$relation_fields should only be used for properties that can be overriden > on field > level from a domain definition, like default value (rdb$default_source) or > not null > (rdb$null_flag). > But for rdb$generator_name and rdb$identity_type this is not the case, like > it is not the > case for computed by (rdb$computed_source). > Do you agree?
No. Two different columns based on the same domain must not share the same sequence, so rdb$generator_name definitely does not belong to rdb$fields. -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
