> I know this is not what many people want to hear, but it's probably high > time to consider IB and FB to be two unrelated databases, and never > expect them to be compatible in any way. With that mindset and those > expectations, you will probably find your life easier. They've diverged. > Get over it and get on with it? :-) > > Kjell > > -- > ------------------------------ > Kjell Rilbe > DataDIA AB > E-post: kjell.ri...@datadia.se > Telefon: 08-761 06 55 > Mobil: 0733-44 24 64 > >
Hi Kjell, i know that but i suppose that in field description FB and IB are still compatible i talking about this declarations in sqlda_pub.h #define SQL_TEXT 452 #define SQL_VARYING 448 #define SQL_SHORT 500 #define SQL_LONG 496 #define SQL_FLOAT 482 #define SQL_DOUBLE 480 #define SQL_D_FLOAT 530 #define SQL_TIMESTAMP 510 #define SQL_BLOB 520 #define SQL_ARRAY 540 #define SQL_QUAD 550 #define SQL_TYPE_TIME 560 #define SQL_TYPE_DATE 570 #define SQL_INT64 580 #define SQL_BOOLEAN 32764 #define SQL_NULL 32766 i suppose that changing integer value from 32764 to the same value as is in Interbase will cause that FB and IB will be compatible for Boolean but may by i am wrong - i know only a little about internals regards, Karol Bieniaszewski ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
