On 11/29/13 14:53, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > In that case someone should pick-up & adapt my patch. I did a patch > against 2.5.2 as current in the current Ubuntu release to unblock > building a handful reverse dependencies. ARM64 is upcoming and highly > viable server platform and I'd hope firebird developers are interested > in enabling it. More so, ARM64 is better supported than some of the > targets/platforms supported by 2.5.2. And I don't have time to work on > trunk, nor deal with issues that trunk may have, and since code base > is different patches on trunk wouldn't have helped my cause. i don't > plan to be involved in firebird development. > > here is a patch =) do as you like with it. >
OK - I understand your position. (A bit surprised that you have no QA machines for an "upcoming and highly viable server platform".) I will apply a patch commented in opder to avoid conflicts with class IDs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
