Alex Peshkoff <peshk...@mail.ru> писал(а) в своём письме Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:07:13 +0400:
> On 12/16/13 14:58, Simonov Denis wrote: >> Dmitry Yemanov <firebi...@yandex.ru> писал(а) в своём письме Mon, 16 Dec >> 2013 14:48:12 +0400: >> >>> 16.12.2013 14:38, Simonov Denis wrote: >>>>> Will the new name-value pairs also be retrievable from sec$users? And >>>>> if >>>>> yes, how ? Text blob with all pairs? >>>> It was nice to have some system stored procedure parses BLOB and >>>> returns a >>>> set of keys and values >>> Wouldn't a table e.g. SEC$USER_ATTRIBUTES be a better solution? >>> >>> >> It certainly would be more convenient to use >> > > Adding one more virtual table seemed to me to be an overcomplication. > But if everybody agree - I see no problems using it instead blob. > > Using the optional system table easier for the end user. If the stored procedure to make analysis, it must necessarily be performed on the system and the low level, because parsing the BLOB fields is not a cheap operation today. Also difficult to determine the dimension of the output arguments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
