Den 2013-12-16 12:40 skrev Dimitry Sibiryakov såhär: > 16.12.2013 12:34, Kjell Rilbe wrote: >> When you want to introduce a new fixed >> attribute, X users will complain about clashes with their already-in-use >> user defined attributes. > In this case you suggest to do something like this: "alter user x set > new_attr 'yy' > attributes (new_attr = 'zz')"? For me it is a mess.
Yes, it's a mess, but will make it easier for users with legacy systems to upgrade. There are several systems out there not being upgraded to ne FB versions for compatibility issues introduced along the way. If such problems can be avoided in a reasonable way, please do. I would argue that this would be at least somewhat clearer (renaming user attributes to tags): alter user x set new_attr 'yy' set tag new_attr 'zz'; Kjell -- -------------------------------------- Kjell Rilbe DataDIA AB E-post: kj...@datadia.se Telefon: 08-761 06 55 Mobil: 0733-44 24 64 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
