>>> I would not give up the compiled binary (for Windows x86). Very  
>>> interesting to compare the performance of cold filling cache.
>> 
>>    I'll prepare binaries at this weekend.
> 
>    Here they are:
> 
> http://web.firebirdsql.org/downloads/rabbits/hvlad/Firebird-3.0.0.30811_Win32-Extents.7z
> http://web.firebirdsql.org/downloads/rabbits/hvlad/Firebird-3.0.0.30811_x64-Extents.7z
> 
>    Note, this build works with changed ODS12, so you should create database 
> for testing
> using this build. 

    With great help of Pavel Zotov i've found and fixed few bugs in that build, 
so i uploaded an
updated binaries for testing:

    
http://web.firebirdsql.org/downloads/rabbits/hvlad/Firebird-3.0.0.30819_Win32-Extents.7z
    
http://web.firebirdsql.org/downloads/rabbits/hvlad/Firebird-3.0.0.30819_x64-Extents.7z

Regards,
Vlad

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to