Hi,
Take into account that user can rollback or commit oryginal transaction before
we copy all data to clone. Is this a problem or is simple to clone transaction
in atomic way?
Regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
----- Reply message -----
Od: "James Starkey" <[email protected]>
Do: "For discussion among Firebird Developers"
<[email protected]>
Temat: [Firebird-devel] How to? Coordinating transactions for multiple
connections in single call
Data: czw., kwi 3, 2014 23:18
Sorry, responded to the wrong message.
That not only works, but also is a very clever idea. It reduces message size
and eliminates the possibility of gibberish entering the system.
It's also an excellent example of how ideas get better from being tossed around.
Nice work.
On Thursday, April 3, 2014, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <[email protected]>
wrote:
Instead of get from info and pass "everything" (possible MBs?) in the
TPB, isn't possible to pass only the "base transaction number" of cloned
transaction, and them the engine instances dumps necessary information,
like with monitoring, so the new transaction could reconstruct the snapshot?
Adriano
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
