Hi Dimitry, May I ask why you say a database system is not suitable for CVS? I had ours on cvs for a few years before moving it to git.
If you view the operational database as source code, then I can understand your point, but, I view an operational database as a compiled end product while the DDL/DML is the source code that has version control applied to it. A standardised DDL/DML extraction tool is all you need. Very simple to setup, very simple to apply the finished product to a database. Part of a standardised build process, of creating and populating a sand box database via scripts, is very easy to setup. I am just trying to understand where you are coming from as this has always been possible from the days of interbase. best regards Dalton On 12 August 2014 12:25, Dimitry Sibiryakov <s...@ibphoenix.com> wrote: > 12.08.2014 18:17, Jim Starkey wrote: > > There used to be database based system to create and edit messages and > generate header and message files. > > Yes, I know that because I am exactly that guy who killed this system > because database > isn't suitable for CVS. > > -- > WBR, SD. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
