On 08/29/14 12:16, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 28.08.2014 22:30, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
>> I think this is a critical decision that should be discussed now,
>> otherwise we can expect lots of mad users when FB 3 is released.
>     A lot of mad users who is unable to hide their sources vs a lot of mad 
> users who got
> exception or unexpected NULL result from old applications (including isql) 
> trying to read
> the sources. Who win?
>

I'm afraid you did not understand what Carlos suggests - he only wants 
to be able to set source field to null like it was possible since fb1 
times (sooner of all in interbase too). Certainly that's not a method of 
protecting, but I see no ways how can it cause unexpected NULL result in 
old app-s - such technique is in use for a long time.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to