On 08/29/14 12:16, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 28.08.2014 22:30, Carlos H. Cantu wrote: >> I think this is a critical decision that should be discussed now, >> otherwise we can expect lots of mad users when FB 3 is released. > A lot of mad users who is unable to hide their sources vs a lot of mad > users who got > exception or unexpected NULL result from old applications (including isql) > trying to read > the sources. Who win? >
I'm afraid you did not understand what Carlos suggests - he only wants to be able to set source field to null like it was possible since fb1 times (sooner of all in interbase too). Certainly that's not a method of protecting, but I see no ways how can it cause unexpected NULL result in old app-s - such technique is in use for a long time. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel