On 09/01/14 01:53, Carlos H. Cantu wrote: > DY> What about unencrypted distributed databases? Should we care about > DY> hiding PSQL source also from SYSDBA / DBO? Are there real cases when it > DY> would be needed? > > Well, the currently "hack" makes no distinction of users, so if the > idea is to maintain currently behavior, it doesn't matter who is the > user, he would see no source. > >>> 1) Create an official way to make the source null > DY> So far I tend voting for (1), using a special syntax. > > +1, and we don't need to advertise it as a protection at all. This > special syntax can be described as to be used by people who doesn't > want to have the plain source code stored in the database (for > whatever is the reason <g>).
That's nice - but what should happen with that special syntax when BLR follows DYN? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
