On 20/04/2015 14:25, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > > I understand that is a very good idea for one to associate their > "metadata" with real objects with a foreign key to a system table, > specially if this foreign key has update/delete cascade, hence not > interrupting the engine from doing anything. > > Why not? > According to Dmitry's suggestion in discussion of > http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4731. > Nobody argued against. > > Ok, "treating system tables like virtual tables" may make sense.
It allow us to restructure internals and transform current system tables to system views in the future, if desired. Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
