On 06/09/2015 12:07 PM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 09.06.2015 07:13, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: >> Ideas? > We could add a new info tag to return the internal ROWS_AFFECTED value, > so that ISQL would not need to rely on separate I/U/D counters. > > Given that ISQL already uses the new API, maybe we could even surface > such an info request directly via the dedicated API method
no problems > rather than > via the isc_info_* tag (or just map the former to the latter internally). > > > Dmitry > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
