11.11.2015 16:15, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 11/11/2015 04:54 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 11.11.2015 14:52, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>> I see no problems from key holder - key name should be passed to it.
>>      Ok.
>>      How can crypto-plugin find out which key name it must provide to key 
>> holder?
>>
>
> Using plugin's configuration this can be done, but that method is far
> from being elegant.
> Do you want to suggest to provide to plugin info about something like
> DbName? May be anything else?

   I think key name (id) used for encryption should be stored at header page
as crypto-plugin name (id) does. Info about database is not needed to crypto-
plugin as it could be easily changed by user and give no info about the key.

Regards,
Vlad


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to