13.11.2015 0:02, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 12.11.2015 22:30, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >>> Yep. As I said, good old style plugins: separate library for each, a >>> definite entry >>>> point for each type which returns ready-to-use plugin class instead of >>>> pointless factory. >> I see no good reason to force people to isolate tightly coupled plugins >> from each other >> just because you not understand difference between module initialization and >> creation of >> plugin instance. > > Can you provide example of such coupled plugins?
All kind of Auth plugins. DBCrypt, WireCrypnt and CryptKeyHolder. > It seems to be a solution looking for a problem. If you are looking for a problem - you'll find it. Despite of it real presence ;) Regards, Vlad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
