On 12/24/2015 08:07 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 24.12.2015 17:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> Use of CPU-accelerated code appears suspicious from non-intel ports POV.
>     Yes. But in this case the hash is only used internally and not stored 
> anywhere. Because
> of this, different platforms can use different algorithms for it. I suspect 
> that "true
> hash" could make distribution of hash values more equival and thus improve 
> overall timing
> for lock table search.

This should be checked. At first one should show that current hash 
provides bad distribution.

>     On the other hand, CS is going down, so lock manager performance may be 
> not a critical
> part anymore?
>

I suppose that users who need high reliability will continue with 
classic. I.e. it's usage will get lower but it will remain.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to