On 12/24/2015 08:07 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 24.12.2015 17:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> Use of CPU-accelerated code appears suspicious from non-intel ports POV. > Yes. But in this case the hash is only used internally and not stored > anywhere. Because > of this, different platforms can use different algorithms for it. I suspect > that "true > hash" could make distribution of hash values more equival and thus improve > overall timing > for lock table search.
This should be checked. At first one should show that current hash provides bad distribution. > On the other hand, CS is going down, so lock manager performance may be > not a critical > part anymore? > I suppose that users who need high reliability will continue with classic. I.e. it's usage will get lower but it will remain. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
