Hi! Original FB/Java plugin had a security database where SYSDBA could define JAAS permissions per users.
Since Java can read files and do bad things, it's SYSDBA (server admin) to define these permissions. And since was SYSDBA task to create users, that was ok. No we can have embedded users in databases and database owners (not SYSDBA) can create users. That created a problem in how FB/Java should manage permissions. Should the FB/Java security database not mention only user names but databases too, and how? Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
