On 03/09/2016 05:42 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 09.03.2016 15:33, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >> Compare it with v2.5 build system. > 2.5 build is about two times faster. > >> Also, tell to yourself how much faster it could be >> if you apply patch you are talking about. > According to VS build timing, it should save me about 10 minutes
Dmitry - I'm surprised much with that time. What 386 box are you building on? :) I have 3 or 4 years old Amd 8120 and full build of btyacc takes 0.3 sec. Yes it's linux not windows but build time should not differ _so_ much. Looks like something seriously wrong with your build machine... ******************************************* FYI: localhost btyacc # make clean rm -f closure.o error.o lalr.o lr0.o main.o mkpar.o output.o mstring.o reader.o readskel.o skeleton.o symtab.o verbose.o warshall.o localhost btyacc # time make -j8 cc -c -o closure.o closure.c cc -c -o error.o error.c cc -c -o lalr.o lalr.c cc -c -o lr0.o lr0.c cc -c -o main.o main.c cc -c -o mkpar.o mkpar.c cc -c -o output.o output.c cc -c -o mstring.o mstring.c cc -c -o reader.o reader.c cc -c -o readskel.o readskel.c cc -c -o skeleton.o skeleton.c cc -c -o symtab.o symtab.c cc -c -o verbose.o verbose.c cc -c -o warshall.o warshall.c cc -o btyacc closure.o error.o lalr.o lr0.o main.o mkpar.o output.o mstring.o reader.o readskel.o skeleton.o symtab.o verbose.o warshall.o main.o: In function `create_file_names': main.c:(.text+0x782): warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' real 0m0.310s user 0m1.062s sys 0m0.178s localhost btyacc # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140 Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
