On 17/03/2016 09:15, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 17.03.2016 15:02, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > >> Was our svn repository allowed for arbitrary branch creation without >> project discussion till now? No! >> >> Now with github that would not even be necessary as one could fork and >> do his things. >> >> So, to allow arbitrary branch creation in the official repository, an >> admin discussion would be needed. > In SVN, we had "sticky" branches for releases, that's all. But the Git > workflow suggests to use branches for the every non-trivial piece of > work. I see no problems with active branching provided that working > branches are removed immediately after merging upstream.
Yes, but branching locally, not pushing personal branches to official repository. Git remote branch delete is not even intuitive. I always need to search and do things scary to delete remote branches. I'd say, If I have a branch which requires major development and want to backup it, I push to my personal fork. If it's a "project thing" (a well discussed, something requiring collaboration, or project do not want to see that work disappear if I go crazy and delete my fork), then it should go to official repository. Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140 Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
