25.05.2016 18:52, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>>> >>Request to rollback to 11. Stack is 14->11->5->10->1->
>>> >>Request to rollback to 10. Stack is 5->10->1->
> How did it happen that savepoint 11 (10 in the second case) was created
> inside the looper but was neither merged not rolled back?
 > I meant savepoints 15 and 5, sorry.

   I'm afraid that this is a result of my optimization: procedure block with 
savepoint 5 
has no exception handlers, so it just pass control to next block without 
rolling this 
savepoint before that.
   But I'd like to preserve this behavior for performance.

> Invalidate transaction and raise error/bugcheck?

   I also would like to have it this way.
   But in version 2.5 rollback to non-existing savepoint was too common case, 
so I'm 
afraid that this bugcheck can be raised too often.

-- 
   WBR, SD.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to