On 10/02/2017 14:20, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 10.02.2017 16:32, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> Firebird BLR must be improved to be easier to read (the code), to be >> easier to generate and parse and to be extensible. > Why to improve something that must die?.. > > I don't see C++, Java, Intel, etc switching from binary code to source code.
Why would Firebird will do it to be slower? Having the source stored and using it when needed is a thing. Recompile text sources for nothing is another thing. Adriano BTW: "this is going to die" for almost 10 years, and the BLR mess is there, limited use of context is there, etc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
